unclecode/toolshrink
toolshrink
Cut large agent tool output by what it means, not by where it was cut. 13 content-aware reducers + DeepSeek Harness plugin.
Install
npx @deepseek-ai/dsh plugin --profile web add github:unclecode/toolshrinkRestart `dsh web` after install. Bundle APIs can change during the developer preview.
README badge
[](https://dshhub.dev/plugins/toolshrink)Paste this into your README. The star count updates with every catalog sync.
From the README
Excerpt from unclecode/toolshrink, cleaned of badges and images.
toolshrink
Cut large agent tool output by what it means, not by where it was cut.
I use Claude Code every day, and I always wanted to intervene in how it manages context. In the early days you could edit the session JSONL directly. Then that door closed.
When DeepSeek open-sourced Harness, where everything is a plugin, I looked inside. Tool output there is cut by size: keep the head, keep the tail, drop the middle. I read Codex and pi, and they do the same. None of them look at what the text contains.
That fails in a predictable way. Your test suite prints 5,000 passing lines and 3 failures in the middle. A size cut keeps the passes and throws away the failures. The model reads it, believes the run, and answers wrong.
So I built the shrinker I always wished Claude Code had. It reads the output first, recognizes its shape, and keeps the part that carries the information:
input: a vitest run, 31,958 chars, 805 lines, budget 2,000 chars
head+tail cut: 1,904 chars the model learns: the summary
toolshrink: 255 chars the model learns: which test failed,
why, at which line, and the summary
Everything removed is counted in a marker the model can read, and the complete original is saved to disk with a locator. Nothing is lost silently.
The cuts
Each cut recognizes one shape of text. The first one that recognizes the input runs. When none does, the size fallback runs, so the result always fits the budget.
| Cut | Recognizes | Keeps | Drops |
|---|---|---|---|
diff | git diff, patches | changed lines, file and hunk headers, 1 context line each side | unchanged context |
json | one JSON value | the structure, 3 samples per long array, 5 keys per wide object, counts | repeated records |
tests | vitest, jest, pytest, cargo test, go test | failures with their explanation, the summary | passing tests |
build | tsc, cargo, gcc, webpack, esbuild | errors and warnings with their code frame, the summary | build progress |
stacktrace | node, Python, Java, Ruby traces | the message and frames in YOUR code | dependency frames, counted |
log | timestamped logs | errors and warnings with the lines before them, the ending | routine lines |
tree | find, ls -R, file listings | the structure, 8 entries per directory, counts | crowded directories |
repeat | retry storms, progress spam | 2 samples per run plus "2,998 similar lines omitted" | consecutive near-identical lines |
lint | eslint, ruff, clippy | each rule with its count and example locations, worst files | repeated occurrences of the same rule |
install | npm, pip, pnpm, cargo | the summary, versions, deprecations, vulnerabilities, errors | fetch and download progress |
csv | CSV, TSV, pipe tables | header, 5 rows from the start, 2 from the end, row and column counts | the rows between |
gitlog | git log, both formats | the 15 newest commits, the total, the authors with counts | older commits |
size | everything (fallback) | bash: the end · grep/read: the start · unknown: both ends | the rest, counted |
Thirteen cuts ship today. Each one is a plain file with a shared interface, so adding your own is one file, not a fork.
Every cut follows four rules, taken from the three agents I read:
…
